Relationship between Curriculum & Instruction
The definition of instruction and curriculum is
subjective. Both curriculum and instruction may take on different meanings
based on the purpose or interpretation whether political, social, or
educational. Curriculum is what is taught in schools, instruction is how
curriculum is delivered and learning is what knowledge or skill has been
acquired. The most common definition of curriculum is based on overt curriculum
which supports an intentional instructional agenda of an educational institute Furthermore,
curriculum is the content of what is being
taught and instruction is the implementation of
teaching according academic curriculum.
The relationship between curriculum and instruction
is intimate. The relationship being so intimate that curriculum and instruction
is often said as though the terms are one word. We may describe the
relationship between curriculum and instruction as a parent and child
relationship. Curriculum takes the role of a parent who
is independent and may function without
instruction; whereas, academic instruction is inherently dependent upon curriculum—much like a child is dependent upon a parent. Curriculum provides
direction for instruction since instruction is the method of delivering
academic curriculum. Instruction may exist without curriculum but would serve
no direct purpose. Curriculum and instruction must be compatible and maintain a
close relationship in order to maximize student learning. The design of
curriculum influences student learning. Curriculum is a vessel that helps learners
gain knowledge, develop skills and broaden understanding and has outcomes that
may be measured . Instruction, on the other hand, is as capricious as an
unpredictable child. The design of instruction is influenced by an educator’s
philosophy and instructional beliefs. Instruction design is developed according
to curriculum but maintains individuality while being dependent upon curriculum
and standards. The prioritization of information found in overt curriculum and
what instruction techniques are used is reflected by a teacher’s philosophy.
Teachers are individuals composed of different biases, attitudes, and personal
philosophy—this human element plays a role in instructional practices. Teachers
instruct according to their personal philosophy. Curriculum and instructional
design alters according to society and is influenced by new technology and
information. The parent-child relationship of curriculum and instruction
suggests opportunity for growth as both the parent and child learn from each
other. Knowledge of the relationship between curriculum and instruction may
help educators strive to provide a quality education to students.
The
Art and Science of Teaching :
Teaching effectively
requires the skill of a knowledgeable and experienced educator. An
understanding of the definition of
teaching aids the educator by providing perspective on different teaching
approaches. Teaching can be convincingly debated as being an art or a science or defined
collectively as an art and a science. The different approaches and ways to
teach make teaching an art but the necessary knowledge of the material being
taught also makes teaching a science. To properly assess the full spectrum of approaches
which teaching encompasses, it is important to understand the different
concepts concerning and defining teaching as an art and a science.
Teaching as a Science:
Science
refers to skills and knowledge that are uniform and structured.
The science of teaching is also in reference to the credentials and
qualifications of the teacher. Standards are scientific as they are used to
represent an absolute. Standards used to test a teacher’s knowledge and ability
is based upon pre-determined criteria. The tests to determine aptitude have the
standards and criteria down to a science. However, such criteria does not calculate the teacher’s individual
personality traits and ability based on the attitude and character of the
instructor. A teacher with knowledge might not be able to reach students as
effectively as one who, although less knowledgeable, is entertaining and witty.
However, the science knowledge aspect of teaching might also represent a
specific learned skill. An instructor’s teaching portfolio is another example
of how teaching is also a science. The
term “portfolio” is often used by artists to represent a collection of an
artist’s noted works that give evidence of the artist’s skills, ability and
talent. Likewise, an instructor’s portfolio is a collection of samples that
demonstrates the teacher’s knowledge, skills and ability
Teaching as an Art : In teaching, as in art, there is no consistency. Teaching performance is based
on competence for a variety of genres besides
scholastic subjects such as narration, computers, dance, drama,
instrumental music, and art. How a subject is being taught is directly related
to the effectiveness of the lesson. Teaching requires intuition which is
ideally described as an art In art,
individualism and expression are the norm. As in teaching, there are numerous styles and approaches on teaching. The
attributes that make a teacher effective and able to reach the students might
be unique to the individual. A certain disposition and one’s individual way of
expression, such traits are difficult to duplicate. A knowledgeable educator
might not necessarily be an effective educator since it is often the personal
attributes of the educator that capture the attention of the student
Interpretation, perception and reception of information suggest that not only teaching but
learning also is an art and a science. Individual learning styles are often
unconsciously used as teaching styles by educators. If the class is comprised
of kinesthetic or tactile learners, and the instructor is a visual learner,
then the instructor is more likely to teach visually rather than
kinesthetically or tactually. Teaching styles are affected by individual
perception and internalized knowledge.
Our opinion, although teaching
is both an art and a science, the art aspect of
teaching is more evident in modern teaching strategies. Technology and
different teaching styles share the same purpose of trying to maintain the
student’s attention and interest. To motive the class and keep the students
interested in learning is a challenge. Students need to be taught to be
involved in their own learning. Distractions and lack of attention in the class
prevents students from obtaining their learning potential.
No comments:
Post a Comment